NCI SEER-Linked Virtual Tissue Repository Pilot

Pamela Sanchez, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Alison L. Van Dyke, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Valentina I. Petkov, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Yao Yuan, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Sarah Bonds, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Connor Valenzuela, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Alyssa W. Tuan, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Radim Moravec, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Sean F. Altekruse, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Aatur D. Singhi, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
Kate M. Serdy, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA
Yun Wu, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Rosemary D. Cress, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA
Jennifer A. Doherty, The Utah Cancer Registry, Salt Lake City, UT
Lloyd Mueller, Connecticut State Department of Public Health, Hartford, CT
Brenda Y. Hernandez, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
Charles F. Lynch, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Thomas C. Tucker, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Xiao-Cheng Wu, LSU Health Sciences Center - New Orleans
Matrisian, Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN), Manhattan Beach, CA
Lynne Penberthy, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD

Abstract

Background: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program with the National Cancer Institute tested whether population-based cancer registries can serve as honest brokers to acquire tissue and data in the SEER-Linked Virtual Tissue Repository (VTR) Pilot. Methods: We collected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue and clinical data from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and breast cancer (BC) for two studies comparing cancer cases with highly unusual survival ( ≥ 5 years for PDAC and ≤ 30 months for BC) to pair-matched controls with usual survival ( ≤ 2 years for PDAC and ≥ 5 years for BC). Success was defined as the ability for registries to acquire tissue and data on cancer cases with highly unusual outcomes. Results: Of 98 PDAC and 103 BC matched cases eligible for tissue collection, sources of attrition for tissue collection were tissue being unavailable, control paired with failed case, second control that was not requested, tumor necrosis ≥ 20%, and low tumor cellularity. In total, tissue meeting the study criteria was obtained for 70 (71%) PDAC and 74 (72%) BC matched cases. For patients with tissue received, clinical data completeness ranged from 59% for CA-19-9 after treatment to > 95% for margin status, whether radiation therapy and chemotherapy were administered, and comorbidities. Conclusions: The VTR Pilot demonstrated the feasibility of using SEER cancer registries as honest brokers to provide tissue and clinical data for secondary use in research. Studies using this program should oversample by 45% to 50% to obtain sufficient sample size and targeted population representation and involve subspecialty matter expert pathologists for tissue selection.