Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol with Ultrasound-Guided Regional Blocks in Outpatient Plastic Surgery Patients Leads to Decreased Opioid Prescriptions and Consumption

Document Type

Conference Proceeding

Publication Date


Publication Title

Aesthetic Surgery Journal


Background: Opioids are a mainstay of pain management. To limit the use of opioids, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols implement multimodal approaches to treat postoperative pain. Objectives: The aim of this paper was to be the first to assess the efficacy of an ERAS protocol for plastic surgery outpatients that includes ultrasound-guided, surgeon-led regional blocks. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing outpatient plastic surgery on an ERAS protocol was performed. These patients were compared to a well-matched group not on an ERAS protocol (pre-ERAS). Endpoints included the amounts of opioid, antinausea, and antispasmodic medication prescribed. ERAS patients were given a postoperative questionnaire to assess both pain levels (0-10) and opioid consumption. ERAS patients anticipated to have higher levels of pain received ultrasound-guided anesthetic blocks. Results: There were 157 patients in the pre-ERAS group and 202 patients in the ERAS group. Patients in the pre-ERAS group were prescribed more opioid (332.3 vs 100.3 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/patient; P < 0.001), antinausea (664 vs 16.3 mg of promethazine/patient; P < 0.001), and antispasmodic (401.3 vs 31.2 mg of cyclobenzaprine/patient; P < 0.001) medication. Patients on the ERAS protocol consumed an average total of 22.7 MME/patient postoperatively. Average pain scores in this group peaked at 5.32 on postoperative day 1 and then decreased significantly daily. Conclusions: Implementation of an ERAS protocol for plastic surgery outpatients with utilization of ultrasound-guided regional anesthetic blocks is feasible and efficacious. The ability to significantly decrease prescribed opioids in this unique patient population is noteworthy.

First Page


Last Page


PubMed ID







Oxford University Press