Authors

Zachary Nelson, HealthPartners and Park Nicollet Health Services, St Louis Park, MN
Abdullah Tarik Aslan, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Nathan P. Beahm, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Michelle Blyth, LSU Health Sciences Center - New OrleansFollow
Matthew Cappiello, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA
Danielle Casaus, University of Kentucky Healthcare, Lexington, KY
Fernando Dominguez, Family Health Centers of San Diego, San Diego, CA
Susan Egbert, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Alexandra Hanretty, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ
Tina Khadem, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
Katie Olney, University of Kentucky Healthcare, Lexington, KY
Ahmed Abdul-Azim, Rutgers Health Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
Gloria Aggrey, Montgomery Medical Associates, Rockville, MD
Daniel T. Anderson, Wellstar MCG Health, Augusta, GA
Mariana Barosa, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
Michael Bosco, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY
Elias B. Chahine, Palm Beach Atlantic University, West Palm Beach, FL
Souradeep Chowdhury, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
Alyssa Christensen, HealthPartners and Park Nicollet Health Services, St Louis Park, MN
Daniela de Lima Corvino, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Margaret Fitzpatrick, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Molly Fleece, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Brent Footer, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC
Emily Fox, UT Southwestern MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Bassam Ghanem, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Fergus Hamilton, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
Justin Hayes, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Boris Jegorovic, Clinic for Infectious and Tropical Diseases "Prof. Dr. Kosta Todorovic", Belgrade, Serbia
Philipp Jent, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
et al

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

11-4-2024

Publication Title

JAMA Network - Open

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Traditional approaches to practice guidelines frequently result in dissociation between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence. OBJECTIVE: To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength. EVIDENCE REVIEW: This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In May 2023, new and existing members were solicited for questions on urinary tract infection prevention, diagnosis, and management. For each topic, literature searches were conducted up until early 2024 in any language. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were developed discussing the available literature and associated risks and benefits of various approaches. FINDINGS: A total of 54 members representing 12 countries reviewed 914 articles and submitted information relevant to 5 sections: prophylaxis and prevention (7 questions), diagnosis and diagnostic stewardship (7 questions), empirical treatment (3 questions), definitive treatment and antimicrobial stewardship (10 questions), and special populations and genitourinary syndromes (10 questions). Of 37 unique questions, a clear recommendation could be provided for 6 questions. In 3 of the remaining questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for certain aspects of the question. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions and aspects of questions not meeting criteria for a clear recommendation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuidelines method for clinical guideline development, the majority of topics relating to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of urinary tract infections lack high-quality prospective data and clear recommendations could not be made. Randomized clinical trials are underway to address some of these gaps; however further research is of utmost importance to inform true evidence-based, rather than eminence-based practice.

First Page

e2444495

PubMed ID

39495518

Volume

7

Issue

11

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share

COinS