Aversion to Mesh Use in Pelvic Floor Surgery in a Latina Population at the U.S.-Mexico Border

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-29-2023

Publication Title

Urogynecology

Abstract

Importance: Limited studies have examined patient aversion to mesh use in pelvic surgery, especially in Latinas. Objective: This study aimed to assess aversion to pelvic surgery with mesh for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in a sample of Latinas on the U.S.-Mexico border. Study Design: This was a cross-sectional study of self-identified Latinas with symptoms of pelvic floor disorders, recruited at their initial consultation visit at a single, academic urogynecology clinic. Participants completed a validated survey to assess perceptions of mesh use in pelvic surgery. Participants also completed questionnaires assessing the presence and severity of pelvic floor symptoms and level of acculturation. The primary outcome was aversion to mesh surgery, as indicated by a response of 'yes' or 'maybe' to the question 'Based on what you already know, would you avoid surgery using mesh?' Descriptive analysis, univariate relative risk, and linear regression analysis were completed to identify characteristics associated with mesh avoidance. Significance was assessed and considered at P values < 0.05. Results: Ninety-six women were included. Only 6.3% had prior pelvic floor surgery using mesh. Sixty-six percent indicated that they would be likely to avoid pelvic surgery that uses mesh. Only 9.4% indicated that they obtained information regarding mesh directly from medical professionals. Levels of concern regarding the use of mesh varied widely (29.2% not worried, 19.1% somewhat worried, 16.9% very worried). Higher percentages of 'more acculturated' participants indicated a desire to avoid mesh surgery (58.7% vs 27.3%, P < 0.05). Conclusions: In this Latina population, a majority of patients indicated an aversion to using mesh in pelvic surgery. Few patients obtained information regarding mesh directly from medical professionals, relying instead on nonmedical sources.

First Page

17

Last Page

25

PubMed ID

37326237

Volume

30

Issue

1

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS