Is it gossip or feedback? Surgical attendings’ perceptions of gossip within residency

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

8-21-2024

Publication Title

Journal of Surgical Education

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gossip—evaluative talk about an absent third party—exists in surgical residency programs. Attending surgeons may engage in gossip to provide residents with feedback on performance, which may contribute to bias. Nevertheless, the perspectives of attending surgeons on gossip has not been studied. DESIGN: In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews about gossip in surgical training were conducted with attending surgeons. We performed a reflexive thematic analysis of transcripts with a grounded theory approach to describe attendings’ perceptions of their role in gossip within surgical residency. SETTING: Interviews were conducted from September 23, 2023, to November 27, 2023 via Zoom™. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen surgery attendings associated with 7 surgical training programs were interviewed. RESULTS: Six themes were developed: 1) Attendings typically view gossip with a negative lens; thus, well-intended conversations about resident performance that meet the academic definition of gossip are not perceived as gossip; 2) Gossip can damage attendings’ reputations as surgeons and educators; 3) Mitigating the negative impacts of gossip by maintaining accurate and objective standards of honest communication is hard; 4) Attendings express concerns about hearing other attendings’ impressions of residents prior to formulating their own opinion; 5) The surgical hierarchy restricts the volume and content of gossip that reaches attendings, which may limit their knowledge of program culture; and 6) It is very difficult to mitigate gossip at the program level. Ultimately, attendings utilize gossip (e.g. triangulating their experience) with the goal of providing residents feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Defining important conversations about resident performance as gossip should not discourage these critically important conversations but rather underscore the importance of combating harmful gossip through 3 behaviors: 1) committing to objective communication; 2) limiting or reframing information about resident performance that is shared with attendings who have yet to formulate their own opinions; and 3) regulating gossip in particular high-stakes microenvironments (e.g. the operating room).

First Page

1362

Last Page

1373

PubMed ID

39173427

Volume

81

Issue

10

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS