Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-21-2023
Publication Title
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to present and describe the Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB), an instrument that was developed to provide a multidimensional evaluation of bruxism status, comorbid conditions, aetiology and consequences. METHODS: The rationale for creating the tool and the road map that led to the selection of items included in the STAB has been discussed in previous publications. RESULTS: The tool consists of two axes, specifically dedicated to the evaluation of bruxism status and consequences (Axis A) and of bruxism risk and etiological factors and comorbid conditions (Axis B). The tool includes 14 domains, accounting for a total of 66 items. Axis A includes the self-reported information on bruxism status and possible consequences (subject-based report) together with the clinical (examiner report) and instrumental (technology report) assessment. The Subject-Based Assessment (SBA) includes domains on Sleep Bruxism (A1), Awake Bruxism (A2) and Patient's Complaints (A3), with information based on patients' self-report. The Clinically Based Assessment (CBA) includes domains on Joints and Muscles (A4), Intra- and Extra-Oral Tissues (A5) and Teeth and Restorations (A6), based on information collected by an examiner. The Instrumentally Based Assessment (IBA) includes domains on Sleep Bruxism (A7), Awake Bruxism (A8) and the use of Additional Instruments (A9), based on the information gathered with the use of technological devices. Axis B includes the self-reported information (subject-based report) on factors and conditions that may have an etiological or comorbid association with bruxism. It includes domains on Psychosocial Assessment (B1), Concurrent Sleep-related Conditions Assessment (B2), Concurrent Non-Sleep Conditions Assessment (B3), Prescribed Medications and Use of Substances Assessment (B4) and Additional Factors Assessment (B5). As a rule, whenever possible, existing instruments, either in full or partial form (i.e. specific subscales), are included. A user's guide for scoring the different items is also provided to ease administration. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument is now ready for on-field testing and further refinement. It can be anticipated that it will help in collecting data on bruxism in such a comprehensive way to have an impact on several clinical and research fields.
First Page
29
Last Page
58
PubMed ID
36597658
Volume
51
Issue
1
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Manfredini, Daniele; Ahlberg, Jari; Aarab, Ghizlane; Bender, Steven; Bracci, Alessandro; Cistulli, Peter A.; Conti, Paulo Cesar; De Leeuw, Reny; Durham, Justin; Emodi-Perlman, Alona; Ettlin, Dominik; Gallo, Luigi M.; Häggman-Henrikson, Birgitta; Hublin, Christer; Kato, Takafumi; Klasser, Gary; Koutris, Michail; Lavigne, Gilles J.; Paesani, Daniel; Peroz, Ingrid; Svensson, Peter; Wetselaar, Peter; and Lobbezoo, Frank, "Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism" (2023). School of Dentistry Faculty Publications. 119.
https://digitalscholar.lsuhsc.edu/sod_facpubs/119
Included in
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms Commons, Dental Public Health and Education Commons, Health Services Administration Commons