Medicaid patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty at lower volume hospitals by lower volume surgeons associated with poorer outcomes

Location

LSUHSC Center for Advanced Learning and Simulation

Document Type

Presentation

Start Date

22-6-2024 8:45 AM

End Date

22-6-2024 9:05 AM

Publication Date

June 2024

Description

Introduction: Medicaid insurance coverage amongst total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients has been associated with worse postoperative outcomes compared with non- Medicaid patients. Surgeons and hospitals with lower annual total joint arthroplasty (TJA) volume have also been associated with worse outcomes. This study sought to characterize the associations between Medicaid insurance status, surgeon case volume, and hospital case volume, and assess rates of postoperative complications compared with other payer types.

Methods: The Premier Database was queried for all adult patients who underwent primary TJA from 2016-2019. Patients were divided based on their insurance status: Medicaid vs. non- Medicaid. The distribution of annual hospital and surgeon case volume was assessed for each cohort. Multivariate analyses were performed accounting for patient demographics, comorbidities, surgeon volume, and hospital volume to assess the 90-day risk of postoperative complications by insurance status.

Results: Overall, 986,230 TJA patients were identified. Of these, 44,370 (4.50%) had Medicaid. In total, 46.4% of Medicaid patients undergoing TJA were treated by surgeons performing <100 TJA cases annually compared to 34.4% of non-Medicaid patients. Furthermore, Medicaid patients were more likely to undergo TJA at lower volume hospitals performing <500 cases annually compared to non-Medicaid patients (50.8% vs. 35.5%). After accounting for differences amongst the two cohorts, Medicaid patients remained at increased risk for postoperative deep venous thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.16, p=0.031), pulmonary embolism (aOR 1.39, p<0.001), periprosthetic joint infection (aOR 1.35, p<0.001), and 90-day readmission (aOR 1.25, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Medicaid patients were more likely to undergo TJA by lower volume surgeons at lower volume hospitals and had higher rates of postoperative complications compared to non- Medicaid patients. Future research should assess socioeconomic status, insurance, and postoperative outcomes in this vulnerable patient population seeking arthroplasty care.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jun 22nd, 8:45 AM Jun 22nd, 9:05 AM

Medicaid patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty at lower volume hospitals by lower volume surgeons associated with poorer outcomes

LSUHSC Center for Advanced Learning and Simulation

Introduction: Medicaid insurance coverage amongst total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients has been associated with worse postoperative outcomes compared with non- Medicaid patients. Surgeons and hospitals with lower annual total joint arthroplasty (TJA) volume have also been associated with worse outcomes. This study sought to characterize the associations between Medicaid insurance status, surgeon case volume, and hospital case volume, and assess rates of postoperative complications compared with other payer types.

Methods: The Premier Database was queried for all adult patients who underwent primary TJA from 2016-2019. Patients were divided based on their insurance status: Medicaid vs. non- Medicaid. The distribution of annual hospital and surgeon case volume was assessed for each cohort. Multivariate analyses were performed accounting for patient demographics, comorbidities, surgeon volume, and hospital volume to assess the 90-day risk of postoperative complications by insurance status.

Results: Overall, 986,230 TJA patients were identified. Of these, 44,370 (4.50%) had Medicaid. In total, 46.4% of Medicaid patients undergoing TJA were treated by surgeons performing <100 TJA cases annually compared to>34.4% of non-Medicaid patients. Furthermore, Medicaid patients were more likely to undergo TJA at lower volume hospitals performing <500 cases annually compared to non-Medicaid patients>(50.8% vs. 35.5%). After accounting for differences amongst the two cohorts, Medicaid patients remained at increased risk for postoperative deep venous thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.16, p=0.031), pulmonary embolism (aOR 1.39, p<0.001), periprosthetic joint infection (aOR 1.35, p<0.001), and 90-day readmission (aOR 1.25, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Medicaid patients were more likely to undergo TJA by lower volume surgeons at lower volume hospitals and had higher rates of postoperative complications compared to non- Medicaid patients. Future research should assess socioeconomic status, insurance, and postoperative outcomes in this vulnerable patient population seeking arthroplasty care.