Economic Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Systems Versus Manual Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy in the United States
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2023
Publication Title
Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this economic modeling study was to compare the cost effectiveness of fully automated retinal image screening (FARIS) to the current practice of universal ophthalmologist referral for diabetic retinopathy in the United States (US) health care system. METHODS: A Markov decision-analytic model was used to compare the automated versus manual screening and management pathway for diabetic patients with unknown retinopathy status. Costs (in 2021 US dollars), quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Sensitivity analysis was performed against a $50,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. RESULTS: FARIS was the dominant screening strategy, demonstrating cost savings of 18.8% at 5 years with equivalent net QALY gains to manual screening. Cost-effectiveness status was dependent on FARIS detection specificity, with a threshold value of 54.8%. CONCLUSION: Artificial intelligence-based screening represents an economically advantageous screening modality for diabetic retinopathy in the US, offering equivalent long-term utility with significant potential cost savings.
First Page
272
Last Page
280
PubMed ID
37078827
Volume
54
Issue
5
Recommended Citation
Chawla, Harshvardhan; Uhr, Joshua H.; Williams, Jonathan S.; Reinoso, Maria A.; and Weiss, Jayne S., "Economic Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Systems Versus Manual Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy in the United States" (2023). School of Medicine Faculty Publications. 2044.
https://digitalscholar.lsuhsc.edu/som_facpubs/2044
10.3928/23258160-20230406-01